I really think other package manager utilities can learn from DNF in this regard. DNF’s layout made it so easy to see what was being updates, what was being removed, etc. Flatpak support went perfectly in fact.įinally, I really liked the readability of DNF. It’s super lightweight, themes well with Gnome Desktop, and has more than enough features for me to use. I’m learning C right now and gnome-builder, while it has some issues, has been a great IDE.
FEDORA 23 WORKSTATION REVIEW SOFTWARE
Wayland’s forced sync and xWayland input lag make it undesirable for gaming, especially with high refresh rate gaming(144hz baby).Īnything related to software development worked very well. I was able to play Red Dead Redemption 2, Cyberpunk 2077, and Titanfall 2 with no issues right out of the box(on EOS, these games straight up refused to startup). It felt like I was actually contributing to the development of Fedora when in reality I probably created one too many annoying bug reports haha.Īfter installing Lutris and Steam, gaming basically worked out of the box on my Desktop. I also really like how easy it is to report any system critical issues directly to Red Hat Bugzilla. It’s nice to know that the app you opened actually crashed instead of waiting a minute then launching from the terminal to see what the error message is. I also enjoyed the crash report application being installed by default. It’s 2021, having a proper decrypt GUI instead of dealing with Grub-rescue was very nice. I also really appreciated the LUKS decrypt boot menu. Most often required much troubleshooting to get encryption to work as well. I’ve had many issues on other distributions to get BTRFS systems to properly work. I really appreciate the fact that Fedora 33 uses BTRFS by default. Now with the system installed, I was on my way to see if this could be my final distribution. Every distro’s installer failed to repair it except Fedora’s which restored Grub and installed Fedora in the empty partition.
FEDORA 23 WORKSTATION REVIEW UPDATE
While it isn’t the dummy-proof installation that Pop!_OS provided, it was a very simple yet effective installer that saved my bacon a few times when Windows update decided to $h!t itself and break the boot loader. Installation: I’ve tried some distros before, mainly Debian-based or Arch-based, and I have to say Fedora Probably has the best installer or somewhat technical people. It seemed like the perfect distro for me to use. rpms, arguably the second most widely used software format (behind. Fedora, a distribution known for using the latest software features, releasing stable releases with a rock-solid reputation, and backed up by Red Hat with access to. One that had the latest software features, was well supported by commercial software and not rely on community packaged releases, and have stable releases and updates where I could rely on the system to work without too many issues.
While EndeavourOS itself is a great distribution, I realized that I would likely benefit more from a different distribution. Why I decided to start using Fedora: My previous installation EndeavourOS, a basic Arch distribution, was having a lot of issues with gaming and WINE. For those who want a basic computer without having to go through some somewhat technical tweaks(AKA normies) then I think there are better options out there. I think the very minimal install, packed with the latest technologies provides a great platform to those who are well versed with Linux-based operating systems. TLDR I think Fedora is a great distribution for software development or as a content creation workstation. If this ends up helping future development of other distribution development, that would be the best I could hope for. I am by no means an authoritative journalist nor an experience Linux user so take my words with a pinch of salt. This is the first time I’ve ever done such a “review” before.
0 kommentar(er)
